A nutrition label
for your media.

You read nutrition labels on food. Why not on the podcasts shaping your worldview? OrgnIQ detects influence techniques — the additives in media — so you can see how processed your information really is.

Influence Nutrition Facts

Serving size: 42 min | 6,840 words

EmotionalHigh
Faulty LogicModerate
Loaded LanguageLow
Trust ManipulationVery High
FramingHigh
Addiction PatternsHigh

32 influence techniques analyzed by XrÆ

Sample analysis

The media isn't broken. It's working exactly as designed.

Corporate media is owned by the corporations and politicians that pay for its advertising. Every editorial decision runs through a filter: will this upset the sponsors? The news you see has already been approved by the people it should be holding accountable.

Independent media was supposed to fix this. But independent creators live and die by algorithms — and algorithms reward one thing: engagement. Outrage gets clicks. Fear drives retention. The most persuasive content rises to the top, not because it's true, but because it triggers dopamine.

The result is a media landscape that looks like choice but functions like a dopamine factory — vertically siloed, emotionally optimized, and quietly training you to crave the next hit. Left or right, mainstream or indie, the incentives all point the same direction: keep you watching, keep you angry, keep you coming back.

The least persuasive information — the stuff that just tells you what happened without trying to make you feel something about it — doesn't drive views. The algorithms don't surface it. So even “independent” creators have a silent partnership with the platforms that give them an audience: perform for the algorithm, or disappear.

OrgnIQ exists because you deserve to know when you're being informed and when you're being worked. Not so you stop consuming media — so you consume it with your eyes open.

Value for Value

OrgnIQ is free. No ads. No corporate sponsors. No data selling. Just transparent media analysis, available to everyone. If this tool gives you clarity, we ask that you return some of that value so we can keep building.

$

One-time contribution. No account needed.

What are media additives?

Just like processed food contains additives you can't taste, media contains influence techniques you might not notice. OrgnIQ's AI detects 32 distinct techniques across six families.

Emotional

Appeals to fear, outrage, or sentiment instead of evidence

"If we don't act NOW, everything we care about is gone."

Faulty Logic

Flawed reasoning presented as sound argument

"Everyone knows this is true" — but is it?

Loaded Language

Word choices that subtly shape your perception

"Crisis" vs "situation" — same event, different feeling

Trust Manipulation

Manufactured credibility or loyalty exploitation

"As a fellow parent, I understand..." — building false kinship

Framing

How stories are constructed to lead to conclusions

Showing only one side, then presenting it as "the full picture"

Addiction Patterns

Hooks that drive compulsive, habitual consumption

"You NEED to hear what happens next..." — the cliffhanger you can't walk away from

The OrgnIQ Score

Every episode gets a score from 0 to 100. A high score means clean, mostly informational content. A low score means heavy use of influence techniques. Think of it like a food purity scale.

We don't judge whether content is “good” or “bad” — just what's in it.

OrgnIQ85–100

Mostly informational

Some Additives65–84

Some techniques present

Artificially Flavored45–64

Moderate influence

Heavily Processed30–44

Heavy influence techniques

Ultra-Processed0–29

Maximum influence density

Transparent by design

All media uses influence techniques. OrgnIQ applies the exact same analysis to every podcast — same model, same rubric, same standards. We don't fact-check or judge ideology. Awareness is the goal.

Most processed this week

The episode with the most influence techniques detected.

The MeidasTouch Podcast

The MeidasTouch Podcast

Trump Panics as Iran Says No Negotiations!!!

22
Ultra-Processed

OrgnIQ Score

28 findings